Follow AAE on:
Subscribe to RSS Feed:
| Stranger Than Fiction: Cheaters and Incompletes? |
| posted by: Alix | November 19, 2010, 04:17 PM |
|
What would school be like without "F"s or consequences for cheating? Students at West Potomac High School in Alexandria, VA are finding out, as their school has determined there is no need for the failing grades in their grading system. Earlier in the school year, the school eliminated the mark for "failure", instead supplying failing students with the letter "I" for incomplete and establishing a policy that would allow students who cheated on exams the chance to make up the test with these "I" grades. What is the significance? For starters, the "I" grade allow students to redeem themselves throughout the year by catching up with coursework and ultimately receiving new marks at the end of the term. Is this a strategy to help struggling kids or is this just another example of coddling underachievers and spreading the message that timeliness and success are not linked? After all, certain students could end up with the same grade as a student who earned an "A" on time and without an incomplete and a grace period. Mary Mathewson, an English teacher at Potomac High is not impressed with the new system, "Kids are under the impression they can do it whenever they want to, and it's not that big of a deal." She argues that taking away the failing mark "takes away one of the very few tools [they] have to get kids to learn", eliminating any sense of responsibility or urgency. On parents ponders, "What about the conscientious student who keeps up with class, studies until 2 a.m. and pulls an A on a math test? Should a peer who skipped class and flubbed the test twice or three times get an equal grade? With the new policy, the ultimate grade on a student transcript could be the same, even though the two students took very different paths." Despite strong opposition, administrators are standing by the new policy. "If we really want students to know and do the work, why would we give them an F and move on?" said Peter Noonan, assistant superintendent for instructional services." . . . I think the students who are struggling should not be penalized for not learning at the same rate as their peers." Administrators are however back pedaling on the cheating controversy, allowing individual teachers to set their own policies. AAE's Tracey Bailey, director of education policy, commented on the story last evening on the local Fox news. Click here for the segment. As an educator, what do you think of this system? Will it help students in the long run or set a dangerous precedent? Comment below.
email to friend
Print
comment
Permalink
Comments (2)
Preparing for the career world?
written by Sara Johnson, November 20, 2010
I wonder what will happen when these students become adults with responsibilities and jobs. What will their responses be when a boss tells them they are not performing up to standard? How will they respond when they get the ultimate F, Fired? What will their parents say then? Will they still blame teachers for their children's behavior and performance?
... written by Alicia, Fort Worth, November 19, 2010
I don't know about the precedent, but look at it from the student's point of view. No matter how well or poorly they do, they get treated the same. Where's the motivation to achieve or learn?
More effective would be to quit separating people into classes based on age, but on level. But, of course, I can't see this working unless it happened on a mass scale, otherwise kids'll insist they're on the "smart" or "dumb" track and act accordingly.
|
Sign up for AAE Emails
Blogroll
- American Board (ABCTE)
- Edspresso (CER)
- Eduwonk
- Flypaper (Fordham)
- Intercepts (Mike Antonucci)
- Jay Greene
- Joanne Jacobs
- Joe Williams (Democrats for Education Reform)
- National Alliance for Public Charter Schools
- Politics K-12 (EdWeek)
- Road to Teaching
- Teacher Beat (EdWeek)
- InformED (AIR)
- This Week in Education
